![]() ![]() ![]() I don't know how to phrase this without it sounding insensitive, though. ![]() Maybe someone put a lot of thought into the gimp UX, but it seems like a wasted effort (or maybe it was just inexperience). I'd hardly call any workflow I design an engineered one (even if I like this field), when compared to something produced by an UX designer (or a team of them) who specialises in the field. Partially agree with you that every UX is "engineered" but that depends on how far we're willing to stretch that definition in the design domain. I didn't mean to sound condescending, and if I hurt any gimp devs, I'd like to apologise. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |